CCN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Crit Care Nurse 1999 Nov; 19(5): 61-67

This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gant, R.
Right arrow Articles by Morton, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gant, R.
Right arrow Articles by Morton, P.
Critical Care Nurse, Vol 19, Issue 5, 61-67
Copyright © 1999 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

The expanding role of signal-averaged electrocardiography

RH Gant, R Henkin, and PG Morton

Signal-averaged electrocardiography is a valuable diagnostic tool for determining which patients recovering from myocardial infarction are at risk of sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias. Additionally, the value of this technique in determining which patients with ischemic heart disease and unexplained syncope are likely to have inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia has been established. This noninvasive screening procedure has shown promise in other clinical situations, but more investigation is needed before definitive recommendation can be made. Critical care nurses can help promote the success of signal-averaged electrocardiography by educating patients, promoting acquisition of a quality recording, helping allay patients' concerns, and participating in research activities.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.