CCN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Critical Care Nurse. 2003;23: 62-67
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Drahozal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Drahozal, R.


Protocols for Practice

Family and Pet Visitation in the Critical Care Unit

Laura Cullen, RN, MA
Marita Titler, RN, PhD
Ronda Drahozal, RN, BSN


Laura Cullen is a project director for research utilization in the Department of Nursing and Patient Care Services at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in Iowa City, Iowa.

Marita Titler is director of nursing research and quality management in the Department of Nursing and Patient Care Services at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in Iowa City, Iowa.

Ronda Drahozal is a staff nurse in the medical ICU in the Department of Nursing and Patient Care Services at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in Iowa City, Iowa.

To purchase reprints, contact The InnoVision Group, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. Phone, (800) 809-2273 or (949) 362-2050 (ext 532); fax, (949) 362-2049; e-mail, reprints{at}aacn.org.


Visitation in critical care units is based on practices initiated with the first intensive care units in the 1960s. Visitation was restricted because little was understood about the impact on the patient or the family, including children. Family-focused care is a challenging concept to implement into practice. A focus on family needs should drive a critical review of current visitation practices in every critical care unit. Research has demonstrated that rigid and restrictive visitation should be abolished, and may actually be harmful to the patient, family members, and family dynamics.1

Family-focused care is ideally based on the identified needs of the family. What constitutes "family" is defined in the broadest terms, to include whomever the patient has identified as a significant relation. The traditional nuclear family is no longer an inclusive description of every patients "family." Research has identified 5 categories of family needs: receiving assurance, remaining near the patient (proximity), receiving information, being comfortable, and having support available.2 Family and pet visitation are nursing interventions to meet support, proximity, information, and comfort needs.

Q: How do patients respond to interactions with family members?

Nurses are often concerned that family and patient interactions will lead to deterioration in hemodynamic or intracranial pressure indices. Nurses, as patient advocates, desire to limit potentially detrimental stimuli. Studies have found a decrease or no significant change in heart rate, blood pressure, or intracranial pressure during family visitation. Monitoring the patient’s physiological response to the presence of family members is important.3–9

Beneficial affects of family interactions with critically ill patients include improved family understanding of the patients condition,3,10 reduced family and patient anxiety,11–14 improved control, and better rest between visits.15 Families have the opportunity to have more of their needs met using an open visitation intervention.16 Opening visitation also improves family satisfaction with the critical care experience.10,13 It would appear that the positive impact of less restrictive family visitation outweighs potentially negative consequences.

Nurses’ perceptions of patient preferences are not always accurate and their attitudes are not always positive.17,18 Patients and families have positive perceptions of family visits.18 Positive beliefs and attitudes of nurses are essential in promoting family visitation. For many nurses, a turning point from excluding to including families in critical care practice is the personal experience of having a relative or loved one hospitalized in a critical care unit.19

Q: How is the family affected by the ICU experience and how can I intervene?

Having a critically ill family member is a very stressful experience. Family responses to a critical illness may include anxiety, anger, and feelings of helplessness.2 The stress of the critical illness on families has been found to lead to sleep loss, poorer nutrition, increased use of cigarettes, alcohol, and medications.20 Families have described feelings of vulnerability, uncertainty, intense emotions, and physical illness in children.21 Research has found extensive family disruption during the critical illness.21

Nursing interventions that support the patient and family are based on assessment of each patient and family’s strengths, preferences, coping styles, and the ability to learn and adapt. Alternatives to restrictive visitation include: flexible, contract, patient-controlled, structured, inclusive and open visitation. Each offers the opportunity for greater support and education of the family by the nurse. Planning visitation should be based on the patient preferences for visitors and when they would like visitors. Preparation of the family and children before visiting is very helpful. Once the family is at the bedside, the nurse has the opportunity to review/update the illness or injury that led to the critical care unit admission, what interventions are being done and how the equipment is used to monitor the patient. The nurse can role-model interactions with the patient.12 Additionally, these interactions provide the opportunity to identify needs that can be referred to other team members (social worker, chaplain, clinical nurse specialist, etc). Providing a means for families to feel connected with the patient is also beneficial (eg, beepers and exchanging phone numbers).2

Nurses competent in meeting the physiologic needs of patients may find new challenges when attempting to meet their psychosocial needs. One third of critical care nurses studied said they did not have the skills needed to meet the psychosocial and emotional needs of families.22 Nurses report that open visitation takes time, causes delays and makes it difficult to provide patient care.17,23 Nurses typically receive very little education regarding meeting family needs. Nurses must know crisis management, provision of empathy, and referral options.1

Therapeutic communication with families is needed to promote understanding of what the patient and family know, clarify misconceptions, and reflecting back what has been voiced. Evaluation of the family’s response to the visit will allow for planning for subsequent visits. Daily interaction with the wide variety of emotions of patients and families is a challenge and may necessitate use of support services by staff. More frequent interactions between family and staff may also be one of the most rewarding components of providing care for the critically ill patient.

Q: Should children be allowed to visit a critically ill sibling or parent?

Children are integral parts of the family unit and are not exempt from the stress of a critical illness of a family member. Children are often shielded from information about the critically ill family member, but are still able to describe what is happening with some accuracy.21,24 Children’s responses to the critical illness of a family member include emotional turmoil, family disruption, need for support, minor illnesses, eating less, and increased difficulty sleeping, among others.25–27 Parents were unable to identify many of these changes.26,28 Child visitation brought no adverse effects and children’s negative behavioral and emotional responses to the family member’s illness were reduced with facilitated child visitation.29,30

Sibling contact with newborns has not been associated with bacterial infections, but screening for communicable diseases is warranted.31,32 Some institutions recommend using a health screening form and health screening guideline when facilitating child visitation in the critical care unit. Contact your hospital epidemiologist for your institution’s guidelines.

Parents have reported that visitation is helpful for siblings during the crisis of a critical illness in the family.24 Parents are in the best position to decide the appropriateness of visitation by each child. Often the child’s imagination creates more distressing images than the accurate information shared during a visit. Age-appropriate interventions are beneficial in helping to prepare children for what they might see, feel and hear.27,29,30,33,34 Use of supplemental material can be useful (eg, photos, illustrations, coloring or story books, and videotapes) in preparing a child to anticipate the visit.

Preparing the child and environment are critical elements to successful child visitation. After the visit, exploration of the child’s interpretation of the visit, along with their feelings and questions, allows for positive reinforcement and correction of misinterpretations. The visit offers opportunities for the parent and child to continue discussions about the visit and the ill family member. Thus child visitation is not harmful and may be helpful for the child and family.

Q: Won’t pet visitation increase risk of infections to patients?

Most of the empirical evidence for animal visitation and infections comes from tracking infection rates in animal visiting programs. Anecdotal evidence is plentiful from programs across the country that have never had any situations of zoonotic infections (infection passed from pet to human) or diseases. Sandra Wallace, MD, infectious disease director at Huntington Memorial Hospital in Pasadena, Calif, is the medical consultant for a successful Animal Assisted Therapy (AAT) program. After thousands of AAT visits, they have never had an episode of a zoonotic infection or evidence of pet transmission of infection from patient to patient (S L Wallace, personal communication, April 17, 1996). Also, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (personal communication) has never had a reported case of infection from pet visitation. Hospitals have been wise, though, and most have stringent protocols to ensure the animals are clean with current vaccinations, and frequent health and behavior screens. The Delta Society35 has played a huge role in educating people and certifying AAT animals that have behaviors and personalities that work well with people in the hospital setting. Controversy still exists whether the immunosuppressed patient should receive AAT. Until more research is done in this area, many institutions opt to play it safe and not allow animals visits to the immunosuppressed.

Q: What benefits does animal or pet visitation provide to my patient?

Again, anecdotal evidence is great in this area. Stories of people getting out of bed or moving and speaking for the first time when their pet or a therapy dog visits are numerous. Many of these benefits are hard to measure and are very subjective, so research is difficult. The research done has shown benefits of decreasing heart rate and blood pressure and increasing skin temperature, indicating relaxation from petting a companion dog.36,37 Other studies suggest that people experiencing stress, either acutely or chronically, may benefit from short-term interactions with their pet that serve to focus attention away from the stressor to a more pleasurable, calming interaction.38–41

Two types of programs are commonly used: family pet visitation and visitation by certified animal-owner teams. In general, suggestions for success include careful selection of the animal, limiting exposure of animal-allergic patients, implementing an infection control program, formulating policies with broad representation, and developing plans for surveillance and response to an emergency situation.42,43 Critical care nursing is more than just meeting the physiologic needs of the patient. Promoting interaction between critically ill patients and family members and/or pets provides a basis for psychological support interventions. The beneficial effects documented in research are limited to the immediate impact. Actual benefits may be far reaching for the patient, family, child, and even the nurse.

Note:

This article was first published in Critical Care Nurse June 1999.

This article is based on the protocol "Family Visitation and Partnership in the Critical Care Unit" by Marita Titler, Ronda Drahozal, and Laura Cullen, from the Creating a Healing Environment Series of AACN’s Protocols for Practice. Protocols can be obtained from AACN, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656–1491, (800) 899-AACN, (949) 362–2000. $11, AACN members; $14, nonmembers.

Go



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 



View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Patient receiving pet therapy.

 
References

  1. Titler MG. Family visitation and partnership in the critical care unit. In: Chulay M, Molter NC, eds. Creating a Healing Environment Series. Aliso Viejo, Ca: AACN.
  2. Leske JS. Family needs and interventions in the acute care environment. In: Chulay M, Molter NC, eds. Creating a Healing Environment Series. Aliso Viejo, Ca: AACN.
  3. Chaves CW, Faber L. Effect of an education-orientation program on family members who visit their significant other in the intensive care unit. Heart Lung. 1987;16:92–99.[Medline]
  4. Fuller BF, Foster GM. The effects of family/friend visits vs staff interaction on stress/arousal of surgical intensive care patients. Heart Lung. 1982;11:457–463.[Medline]
  5. Kleman M, Bickert A, Karpinski A, et al. Physiologic responses of coronary care patients to visiting. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1993;7(3):52–62.
  6. Schulte DA, Burrell LO, Gueldner SH. Pilot study of the relationship between heart rate and ectopy and unrestricted vs restricted visiting hours in the coronary care unit. Am J Crit Care. 1993;2:134–136.
  7. Simpson T, Shaver J. Cardiovascular responses to family visits in coronary care unit patients. Heart Lung. 1990;19:344–351.[Medline]
  8. Hendrickson SL. Intracranial pressure changes and family presence. J Neurosci Nurs. 1987;19:14–17.[Medline]
  9. Prins MM. The effect of family visits on intracranial pressure. West J Nurs Res. 1989;11:281–297.[Free Full Text]
  10. Henneman EA, McKenzie JB, Dewa CS. An evaluation of interventions for meeting the information needs of families of critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 1992:3:85–93.
  11. Frederickson K. Anxiety transmission in the patient with myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 1989;18:17–22.[Medline]
  12. Holl RM. Role-modeled visiting compared with restricted visiting on surgical cardiac patients and family members. Crit Care Nurs Q. 1993;16(2):70–82.[Medline]
  13. Ward CR, Constancia PE, Kern L. Nursing interventions for families of cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1990;5(1):34–42.[Medline]
  14. Ziemann KM, Dracup K. Patient-nurse contracts in critical care: a controlled trial. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1990;5(3):98–103.[Medline]
  15. Lazure LL, Baun MM. Increasing patient control of family visiting in the coronary care unit. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4:157–164
  16. Freismuth C. Meeting the needs of families of critically ill patients: a comparison of visiting policies in the intensive care setting. Heart Lung. 1986;15:309–310.
  17. Kirchhoff KT, Pugh E, Calame RM, Reynolds N. Nurses’ beliefs and attitudes toward visiting in adult critical care settings. Am J Crit Care. 1993;2:238–245.
  18. Simpson T. Critical care patients’ perceptions of visits. Heart Lung. 1991;20:681–688.[Medline]
  19. Chesla CA. Reconciling technologic and family care in critical-care nursing. Image J Nurs Sch. 1996;28:199–204.[Medline]
  20. Halm MA, Titler MG, Kleiber C, et al. Behavioral responses of family members during critical illness. Clin Nurs Res. 1993;2:414–437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Titler MG, Cohen MZ, Craft MJ. Impact of adult critical care hospitalization: perceptions of patients, spouses, children, and nurses. Heart Lung. 1991;20:174–182.[Medline]
  22. Hickey M, Lewandowski L. Critical care nurses’ role with families: a descriptive study. Heart Lung. 1988;17:670–676.[Medline]
  23. Halm M, Titler M. Appropriateness of critical care visitation: perceptions of patient, family members, nurses and physicians. J Nurs Quality Assurance. 1990;5(1):25–37.
  24. Kleiber C, Montomgery LA, Craft-Rosenberg M. Information needs of siblings of critically ill children. Children’s Health Care. 1995;24:47–60.
  25. Craft MJ, Cohen MZ, Titler M, DeHamer M. Experience in children of critically ill parents: a time of emotional disruption and need for support. Crit Care Nurs Q. 1993; 16(3):64–71.[Medline]
  26. Craft MJ, Wyatt N, Sandell B. Behavior and feeling changes in siblings of hospitalized children. Clin Pediatr. 1985;24: 374–378.
  27. Craft MJ, Wyatt N. Effect of visitation upon siblings of hospitalized children. Matern Child Nurs J. 1986;47–59.
  28. Craft MJ, Craft JL. Perceived changes in siblings of hospitalized children: a comparison of siblings and parent reports. Children’s Health Care. 1989;18:42–48.
  29. Nicholson AC, Titler MG, Montgomery LA, et al. Effects of child visitation in adult critical care units: a pilot study. Heart Lung. 1993;22:36–45.[Medline]
  30. Schwab F, Tolberg B, Bagnata S, Maisels MJ. Sibling visiting in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 1983;71:835–838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kowba MD, Schirian PM. Direct sibling contact and bacterial colonization in newborns. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1985;14:412–417.[Medline]
  32. Solheim K, Spellacy C. Sibling visitation: effects on newborn infection rates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1988;18:43–48.
  33. LaMontagne LL. Three coping strategies used by school-age children. Pediatr Nurs. 1984;10(1):25–28.[Medline]
  34. Shonkwiler MA. Sibling visits in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Q. 1985;8(1):67–72.
  35. Frederickson M. Pet Partners Program. Introductory Handler Skills Course for Animal-assisted Activities and Therapy. Home Study Version. 2nd ed. Renton, Wash: Delta Society; 1996.
  36. Thoma LM. Physiological Effects in the Hypertensive Individual of Petting Bonded vs Nonbonded Dogs [thesis]. Omaha, Neb: University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing; 1984.
  37. Toss-Schulke ST, Trask B, Wallace C. Petting a Companion Dog and Coronary Prone Behaviors: Effects on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and Peripheral Skin Temperature [dissertation]. Omaha, Neb: University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing; 1988.
  38. Brickel CM. A review of the roles of pet animals in psychotherapy and with the elderly. Int J. Aging Hum Dev. 1980;12:119–128.[Medline]
  39. Friedman E, Katcher A, Thomas S, Lynch J, Messent PR. Social interaction and blood pressure. Influence of animal companions. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1983;171:461–464.[Medline]
  40. Messnet PR. Social facilitation of contact with other people by pet dogs. In: Katcher AH, Beck AM, eds. New Perspectives on Our Lives With Companion Animals. Philadelphia, Pa: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1983:37–46.
  41. Wilson CC. The pet as an anxiolytic intervention. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991;179:482–489.[Medline]
  42. Cole KM, Gawlinski A. Animal-assisted therapy in the intensive care unit. A staff nurse’s dream comes true. Nurs Clin North Am. 1995;30:529–537.[Medline]
  43. Titler MG, Drahozal R. Family pet visiting, animal-assisted activities, and animal-assisted therapy in critical care. In: Chulay M & Molter NC, eds. Creating a Healing Environment Series. Aliso Viejo, CA: AACN.
  44. Proulx D. Animal-assisted therapy. Crit Care Nurse. 1998;19(3):80–84.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Drahozal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Drahozal, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS