CCN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Crit Care Nurse 2003 Oct; 23(5): 69-71

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haghenbeck, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haghenbeck, K. T.


Progressive Care

Follow the Rules to Safer Care Delivery

Karen Toby Haghenbeck, RN, C, PhD, CCRN


Karen Toby Haghenbeck is an assistant professor at Pace University’s Lienhard School of Nursing, New York, NY.

Reprinted with permission from Nursing Management, 33(10):36–41, 44, 2002.


When planning for safe and appropriate care of acutely ill patients in your progressive care unit (PCU), several regulatory sources provide helpful tools, guidelines, and requirements. For starters, you’ll want to refer to the minimum guidelines on staffing and care quality that your PCU must meet to receive funding for the care of Medicare and Medicaid Patients. Consult the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) (http://cms.hhs.gov) for these guidelines. All of the standards are also available in the Condition of Participation for Hospitals, detailed in the Code of Federal Regulations.

As described in Part 4 of this 6-part series exclusively endorsed by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN),1 consider technology’s improvements in quality and safety of care. You’ll also want to review organizational and system factors such as staffing, admission criteria, and your environment of care. Only eight states define "special care unit": Arkansas, California, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Wyoming.2 Twenty-one state administrative codes and regulations don’t define "special care unit."

You and your care team should well-acquaint yourselves with your state’s nurse practice act, which you can use to evaluate your PCU’s practice and care delivery. For guidelines, consult associations such as the AACN and the American Nurses Association, which offer position statements on end-of-life care, accepting assignments, and staffing.

Let JCAHO Help

Consider the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) National Patient Safety Goals for 2003 when developing PCU patient care plans. JCAHO targets patient identification confusion, caregiver miscommunication, wrong-site surgery, infusion pumps, medication mix-ups, and alarm systems in its 2003 standards. JCAHO’s six goals are to:

  1. improve patient identification accuracy;
  2. improve caregiver communication effectiveness;
  3. improve high-alert medication usage safety;
  4. eliminate wrong-site, wrong-patient, and wrong procedure surgery;
  5. improve infusion pump usage safety; and
  6. improve clinical alarm system effectiveness.3

When creating a patient safety plan, consider its scope, structure, coordination mechanisms, patient and staff education, and safety improvement activities.4 (See "Patient safety outline.")

Become Techno Savvy

Technology in the PCU can save time and labor, improve patient care, and make nursing practice more scientific.5,6 But it can also create extra work for nurses who have to learn about its mechanical operation, use, maintenance, and troubleshooting techniques before using it safely and efficiently.7,8

When evaluating progressive care technology, seek out established safety, reliability, and validity standards for the type of technology you’ll be using. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the primary regulatory agency for technology, requires that a manufacturer provide evidence of the safety, effectiveness, efficacy, clinical utility, and risks of a technology before allowing its use in patient care.9 The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) has also published safety and effectiveness standards for critical care monitoring devices, and a model for assessing technology.10 These standards apply to new equipment but not to upgrades of older equipment. The FDA approval and SCCM standards may provide a false sense of security about the safety of these upgraded technologies. So when selecting equipment, consider all safety records and repair reports.

JCAHO doesn’t regulate technology prior to its use in the patient care environment. Its standards provide for safe effective use of technology in all hospital environments and are rather generic in scope, recommending the frequency for inspecting and maintaining technology to keep it in proper working order. JCAHO also suggests that you keep records indicating dates of inspection and problems encountered with the technology. Although they call for adequate patient monitoring, the JCAHO standards don’t stipulate what type of equipment to use in a clinical area. The hospital decides the amount and type of technology in the PCU as it applies to its specific patient population.

After you’ve selected a piece of equipment, inform the vendor of your expectations for product support and staff training and competency. Decide if you’ll need ongoing support only during the start up period.11

Stay in the Know

Manufacturer representatives, hospital educators, peers, and audiovisuals typically instruct nurses about using technologies. The PCU nurse manager should develop a close relationship with the bioengineering, risk management, and education departments to ensure consistency in the amount and type of information presented to staff.

Although standardized educational requirements for using technology don’t exist, educational programs from vendors do address solutions such as templates for preparing policies and procedures, as well as competency checklists. If the vendor doesn’t provide competency checklists, obtain them from the AACN. Although not specific to a certain brand of device, you can customize them to meet your needs. Most PCUs use checklists upon first use of a technology or procedure and annually for determining and maintaining employee competence.

Several of these checklists aid in the use of telemetry systems. They help nurses work smarter and streamline patient flow between PCUs and intensive care units (ICUs). Telemetry systems and central station monitoring have advanced the use of non-invasive monitoring for use in PCUs.

As more patients undergo continuous respiratory monitoring in either PCUs or high acuity medical surgical units, more regulatory and professional groups have also provided guidelines. One example is the guidelines for continuous respiratory monitoring.12 Educated caregivers can apply them to ensure safe, non-invasive oxygenation monitoring to patients outside of the ICU.

When Technology Fails

Unfortunately, technology sometimes malfunctions. Nurses prepared to handle malfunctions provide a safer patient care environment. Because malfunctioning technology may inaccurately portray a patient’s condition, nurses should fully develop and rely on their assessment skills to ensure safe, effective, and efficient patient care in conjunction with their knowledge of the technology.

When a piece of equipment malfunctions, whether it’s an IV infusion pump or an enteral feeding pump, initial concerns should address the patient’s safety. Once the patient is stable and the situation corrected, inspect the technology and review events surrounding the incident.

Managers and staff should complete occurrence reports to ensure technology evaluation and repair and to help identify consistent or recurrent problems. Make technology reporting part of the patient safety plan and provide the PCU staff with a clear definition of terms. A willingness to report errors must be part of the culture in your care environment.

Encourage staff to view the occurrence report as a way to identify and track problems. Researchers found that critical care nurses felt these reports helped to identify problem areas, but they also felt that an occurrence report would suggest they were to blame for the malfunction, resulting in a "black mark" on their record.13 Emphasize the importance and the positive aspects of occurrence reports in avoiding future problems, and reassure nurses that no one will blame them.

Report any problems with technology to the bioengineering department and the manufacturer. If the nurse manager feels that the manufacturer isn’t responding in a meaningful way to the concerns with the technology, escalate the discussion to the risk management department. If a resolution with the manufacturer doesn’t occur, the hospital should file a report with the FDA, which compiles information on problems with technology and follows up with manufacturers to promote staff and patient safety. Obtain forms for reporting problems to the FDA from its Web site, http://www.fda.gov.

Plan on It

Consult national, state, and association regulations and recommendations to forge an appropriate PCU patient safety plan. Once you establish these guidelines, you’re best suited for effective and efficient use of available technology.

References

  1. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: ICU Core Measures Task Force, 2002.
  2. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: 2003 National Patient Safety Goals; available on-line: http://www.jcaho.org.
  3. Ibid.
  4. Haghenbeck K.: Critical Care Nurses’ Lived Experience When the Technology Used in the Care of Critically Ill Patients Malfunctions, doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University, university microfilms no.3043442, 2002.
  5. Sandelowski M.: "(Ir)reconcilable Differences: The Debate Concerning Nursing and Technology," Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 29(2): 169–174, 1997.
  6. Mitcham C.: Thinking Through Technology: The Pathway Between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  7. Sandelowski M.: Devices & Desires: Gender, Technology and American Nursing. Chapel Hill, N.C.: The University of North Carolina Press, 2000.
  8. Ahrens T.: "Impact of Technology on Costs and Patient Outcome," Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 10(1):117–125, 1998.[Medline]
  9. Haghenbeck K.: loc cit.
  10. Stahl M.: "An Upstream Approach to Selecting Progressive Care Technology," Nursing Management. 33(8):27–30, 2002.
  11. The Consortium on Respiratory Monitoring on the General Care Floor: "Principles and Guidelines for Respiratory Monitoring on the General Care Floor," Journal of Clinical Monitoring. 12(5):411–416, 1996.[Medline]
  12. Haghenbeck K.: loc cit.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haghenbeck, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haghenbeck, K. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS