CCN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Critical Care Nurse. 2004;24: 18-30
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Take the CE Test
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frakes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frakes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, T.


Cover Article
CE Article

Major Pelvic Fractures

Michael A. Frakes, RN, BSN,CFRN, CCRN, EMTP
Tracy Evans, RN, MSN, MPH, ACNP, CEN, CCRN, EMTP


Michael Frakes is a senior flight nurse with LIFE STAR at Hartford Hospital in Hartford, Conn.

Tracy Evans is the trauma program manager and director of emergency medical services at Norwalk Hospital in Norwalk, Conn.

To purchase reprints, contact The InnoVision Group, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. Phone, (800) 809-2273 or (949) 362-2050 (ext 532); fax, (949) 362-2049; e-mail, reprints{at}aacn.org.

This article has been designated for CE credit. A closed-book, multiple-choice examination follows this article, which tests your knowledge of the following objectives:

  1. Discuss factors related to the anatomy of the pelvis that impact injuries in major pelvic fractures
  2. Identify important aspects of the physical assessment examination for fracture and associated injuries
  3. Distinguish fracture types and classifications
  4. Describe nursing care considerations in the management of patients with major pelvic fractures


The spectrum of patients with pelvic fractures ranges from patients with isolated, simple fractures to critically injured patients with multiple other life-threatening injuries. Critical care nurses care for patients with major pelvic fractures in many settings, including transport, trauma resuscitation bays, perioperative areas, and intensive care units. Accordingly, they need to understand the issues involved in providing that care. In this article, we survey the current information on pelvic fractures, including epidemiology, anatomy, assessment of patients, hemorrhage, management, and associated injuries.


   Epidemiology
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Motor vehicle crashes, including motor vehicles crashing into pedestrians, cause about 60% of pelvic fractures. Most of the remainder result from falls.1–8 Frequency of fracture is highest for occupants of sub-compact or compact automobiles and for occupants of any vehicle struck on the side.9

Pelvic fracture generally contributes to traumatic death but is not the primary cause.2 For patients with pelvic fractures who die, hypotension at the time of admission is associated with increased mortality (42% vs 3.4% for patients with stable vital signs), as are head injuries requiring neurosurgery (50% mortality); abdominal injuries requiring laparotomy (52% mortality); and concomitant thoracic, urological, or skeletal injuries (22% mortality).5,7,10–13 Survival is worse for patients with open pelvic fractures and for pedestrians struck by cars.5,7,12,13 Pelvic fractures are less common and less lethal in children than in adults.14


   Anatomy
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The pelvis protects the viscera, transmits weight from the trunk to the lower limbs, and has attachment points for muscles. The abilities to stand and to bear weight require stability of the pelvic ring, made of the sacrum and aspects of the paired innominate bones. The innominate bones are formed bilaterally by the ilium, the ischium, and the pubis7,8 (Figures 1Go and 2Go). These bones are inherently unstable and gain stability only with ligamentous support, especially around the sacroiliac joint posteriorly. Figure 3Go depicts the ligamentous network. The junction of the ilium, ischium, and pubis forms the acetabulum, the concave socket for the femoral head, and the anterior aspects of the innominate bones join with a cartilaginous disk to form the pubic symphysis. The pubic symphysis is important for pelvic support, but disruption of the symphysis by itself does not make the pelvis unstable.7,15,16



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Bony anatomy of the pelvis. Copyright-protected material used with the permission of the authors and the University of Iowa’s Virtual Hospital, www.vh.org.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Radiographic anatomy of the pelvis. Copyright-protected material used with the permission of the authors and the University of Iowa’s Virtual Hospital, www.vh.org.

 


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Ligamentous anatomy of the pelvis. Copyrighted image courtesy of Wesley Norman, MD, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission.

 
A stable pelvis can withstand normal vertical and rotational physiological forces, but either fractures or ligamentous injuries can disrupt pelvic stability. Disruption of the anterior pelvic ligaments creates rotational instability, whereas posterior ligamentous injury creates both rotational and vertical instability.17

Pelvic blood supply comes primarily from the iliac and hypogastric arteries, which run at the level of the sacroiliac joints. Those arteries are supplemented by a rich associated network, including the superior gluteal artery, which is susceptible to injury in posterior fractures, and the obturator and internal pudendal arteries, which can be injured in fractures of the ramus8 (Figure 4Go).



View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Pelvic vasculature. Copyrighted image courtesy of Wesley Norman, MD, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission.

 

   Assessment for Fracture and Associated Injuries Physical Examination
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Pelvic fractures can be accurately diagnosed through physical examination, but a high index of suspicion for a fracture based on the mechanism of injury is essential.18 Examination begins with inspection for abrasions and contusions, symmetry, isolated rotation of a lower extremity, and discrepancy in limb length. Discrepancy in limb length may be due to a hip injury, a femoral injury, or a vertically unstable pelvic injury.7 A rotated iliac crest indicates a serious fracture.8 Rotational stability is evaluated by palpating for tenderness and crepitus with inward and posterior compression of the iliac crests and with posterior compression of the pubic symphysis.17 Rocking the pelvis is inappropriate, and care must be taken to avoid displacing a fracture or disrupting a pelvic hematoma during the examination. If no fracture of a lower extremity has occurred, vertical stability is assessed by longitudinal manual traction on the lower extremities.7 Tenderness over the trochanter indicates acetabular or femoral head injury. Any skin defect over the pelvis should be investigated as a possible open fracture.7,8

Genitourinary injuries complicate up to one quarter of pelvic fractures, particularly those fractures with genitourinary injury at or near the pubic symphysis.19 Up to 6% of women and 11% of men who have pelvic fractures have urethral injuries; the frequency is lower in infants and children.20,21 Blood at the urinary meatus or a "high riding" prostate suggests a urethral injury and is a relative contraindication for placement of a Foley catheter.7,8

If urethral injury is suspected, a retrograde urethrogram should be obtained before placement of a catheter in the bladder. For retrograde urethrograms, an abdominal plain radiograph is obtained, and then 60 mL of contrast material is injected directly into the urethra via a snugly placed syringe. Another radiograph is obtained during injection of the last 10 mL of contrast material. Extravasation of the contrast material indicates urethral injury.16

Other genitourinary injury is also possible, so a urine sample should be collected. Microscopic hematuria is rarely associated with significant injury, but gross hematuria should prompt further evaluation.22 If urethral injury is excluded, gross hematuria suggests bladder or renal injury. Transmitted forces can rupture a full bladder, but only a bony fragment will injure an empty one. The bladder can be evaluated by using cystography; a Foley catheter is inserted, and radiographs are obtained when the bladder is filled with up to 400 mL of contrast material and again after the contrast material is drained.16 In patients with stable hemodynamic status, both the bladder and the kidneys can be evaluated by using computed tomography (CT).

Male sexual dysfunction is associated with pelvic trauma, and the frequency of impotence both with and without urethral rupture is significant.8 Gynecologic and vaginal injuries are rare with pelvic fracture, and most gynecologic injuries occur in women who are pregnant.7

Gastrointestinal injury associated with pelvic fracture can occur either as a separate traumatic injury or as a laceration by the sharp edge of a fractured bone. Both rectal and vaginal examinations are necessary to rule out communication through a laceration. Especially in obtunded patients, it is important to keep from creating such a communication during the examination.7,16 Gastrointestinal injury can be difficult to detect, because even guaiac testing for occult blood is not a completely reliable indicator.23

The proximity of neurological structures to the sacrum and acetabulum creates the possibility for nerve injury.16 Spinal cord injury is most often associated with pelvic fracture when patients have vertical sacral fractures at or above the level of L5 or any transverse sacral fracture.16 Injuries at specific levels cause specific deficit patterns, so the dermatomes at and below L5 should be assessed carefully. Particular attention should be paid to plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the great toe, sensation in the foot, and the Achilles deep tendon reflex.8,16 Table 1Go describes expected nerve function. The cauda equina syndrome, a saddle-shaped area of defect with leg weakness and plantar flexion weakness, also sometimes occurs.7,8


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Nerve assessment in pelvic fractures8

 

   Radiological Studies
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines24 recommend an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph for all patients with multiple trauma. That radiograph alone is adequate for classification and management of most pelvic fractures, but it does not reveal some sacral fractures or sacroiliac injuries, and it does not reliably indicate the amount of bony displacement.8 Some patients with multiple trauma may not need routine anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. In patients who are awake and alert and have no clinical evidence of pelvic fracture, anteroposterior radiographs reveal unexpected injuries less than 1% of the time. The radiographs are essential for some patients, however, because physical examination by itself is inadequate in adults who are not alert and is only 69% to 90% sensitive for detection of pelvic fractures in infants and children.25–28

On radiographs, a normal pubic symphysis is less than 5 mm wide and has less than 3 mm of vertical offset. Overlap is abnormal. Generally, the pelvic structures should be symmetrical about the midline, and edges and curves should be generally smooth (Figure 2Go). Positioning and technique can cause pelvic rotation on plain radiographs, and the degree of rotation should be evaluated by looking at the size and shape of the iliac wings.7

Other radiological views can provide additional information. An inlet projection, in which the x-ray beam is angled from the head toward the feet, offers improved views of superiorly and posteriorly displaced posterior fractures, posteriorly displaced anterior arch injuries, and sacroiliac widening. The outlet view, with the x-ray beam angled toward the head, gives better views of sacral fractures and sacroiliac joint injuries.8 These views are less commonly used now, because CT scans and reconstructions are widely available. The greater detail and multiple views with CT scanning are especially useful for evaluating sacral, sacroiliac, posterior arch, and acetabular injuries, and CT scans also allow visualization of retroperitoneal hematomas.7,8


   Fracture Types and Classifications
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
When injury is found, a number of classification systems to describe pelvic fractures are available. Two of the most prominent are the Tile classification10 and the Young and Burgess classification,29 which are based on the direction of the injury, pelvic stability, and forces involved (Table 2Go). Classification helps in identifying associated injuries, correlates with the degree of pelvic injury, and is useful in preparing for definitive orthopedic repair.10,29–31 Fracture classification, however, is not essential for developing early strategies for management of patients with pelvic fractures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Classification schemes for pelvic fractures

 
Fractures of the Ramus and Acetabulum
Patients with low-force injuries generally have stable fractures and stable vital signs. One third of all pelvic fractures are individual bone fractures without involvement of the pelvic ring.10 An isolated, nondisplaced fracture of the pubic ramus is the most common pelvic fracture; it often occurs in elderly patients who fall. It should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any patient with hip pain. Fractures of both the superior and inferior pubic rami on the same side are also common and are also typically stable.8,18

A special type of ramus fracture is the straddle fracture, caused by direct injury of the pubic arch or by lateral compression forces. The injury produces either a fracture of all 4 rami or ipsilateral rami fractures with disruption of the pubic symphysis. Genitourinary injury is common with straddle fractures, and clinical manifestations often include anuria, hematuria, or perineal ecchymosis.16

The acetabulum is involved in about 20% of pelvic fractures in adults and may involve injury of the femoral head or fracture of the pelvic ring.18 A complex classification scheme for acetabular injuries essentially describes the anatomical locations of fractures across or within the acetabulum, as well as fractures of the posterior hip. A posterior hip dislocation is common with a posterior fracture of the acetabular hip, and displacement of the femoral head is highly suggestive of some acetabular injury.8,10 Hip pain aggravated by percussion of the greater trochanter or the talus is also suggestive of acetabular injury.8 Injuries to the sciatic nerve complicate more than 10% of acetabular fractures.15

High-Energy and Pelvic Ring Fractures
Higher energy injuries produce greater structural and hemodynamic damage to both the pelvis and other organs. Compared with patients with low-energy fractures, patients with high-energy fractures of the pelvic ring have higher transfusion requirements, between 3.6 and 14.8 units, and more than three quarters have associated head injury, hemothorax, pneumothorax, splenic laceration, or gastrointestinal or genitourinary injuries.29

Because the pelvis has a ring shape and because the sacroiliac joints are relatively immobile, displacement of the pelvic ring requires a break in 2 places. Even if plain radiographs appear to show only an isolated displaced anterior fracture, bone scans and autopsy studies indicate that all patients who have anterior pelvic ring displacement have a posterior pelvic ring injury as well.32,33 Patients with double breaks in the pelvic ring are severely injured. These fractures, from either anteroposterior or lateral compression, always create rotational instability and may or may not be vertically unstable. If the compression force is sufficient to cause both rotational and vertical instability, the significant ligamentous and bony injuries are typically complicated by damage to both vascular and nerve structures. The direction of injury helps define common patterns of injury.8

The so-called open-book fracture is caused by a severe anteroposterior compression force, such as a head-on motor vehicle crash, that causes disruption at the pubic symphysis (Figure 5Go). The sacroiliac joint remains supported by the posterior ligaments and opens like a hinge, creating a pelvis that is vertically stable but rotationally unstable.10 Associated injuries to the neurological and vascular structures in the posterior arch are common, and increased pelvic volume allows the collection of a large amount of blood. Patients with severe anteroposterior injuries have the highest crystalloid and blood requirements of all patients with pelvic fractures.8,29



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Plain radiograph of open-book pelvic fracture. Note widening of the pubic symphysis and disruption at the right sacroiliac joint, creating a fracture with vertical and rotational instability. Image courtesy of Adam Starr, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex. Reprinted with permission.

 
High-energy lateral forces such as a side-impact motor vehicle crash or a car striking a pedestrian cause inward rotation of the hemipelvis and rotational instability.8,10 Pelvic volume is decreased with these injuries, and although critically injured, these patients generally have much lower fluid resuscitation requirements than do other patients with pelvic injuries caused by high-energy forces.8,29

High-energy vertical forces transmitted to the pelvis via extended femurs can produce unique injury patterns. Malgaigne fractures are anterior fractures through the rami and/or pubic symphysis coupled with posterior fracture of the ipsilateral ilium, sacrum, or sacroiliac joint.

The combination of anterior and posterior injury creates both rotational and vertical instability, and mortality and morbidity in patients with Malgaigne fractures are high. The bucket-handle fracture is similar, with the posterior injury on the contralateral side.16 These injuries could be caused by motor vehicle crashes in which the force of a frontal impact is transmitted through extended legs or by a long fall with a foot-first landing.


   Acute Injury and Management Pelvic Bleeding
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The most common cause of death in patients with lateral compression pelvic fractures is an associated closed-head injury; death in patients with anteroposterior pelvic injuries is related to pelvic bleeding and visceral injuries.29 Among patients in whom death is due solely to pelvic fracture, 65% die because of exsanguination.8

About 90% of hemorrhaging associated with pelvic fractures is venous bleeding from fractured bone surfaces. The fracture site itself is the primary bleeding source in about 86% of injuries. An arterial source amenable to embolization occurs in only about 10% of patients.7,12 Large venous injury is even less common; it occurs in 1% or less of patients.34 Patients with injury to large vessels have very high mortality rates, up to 85%, and are typically hypotensive at the time of admission. Pedestrians struck by cars have the highest incidence of large vessel injury.7

Blood from pelvic fractures typically goes into the retroperitoneum, which can hold up to 4 L.7,8 An intact peritoneum is important in controlling retroperitoneal bleeding, and movement during examination, resuscitation, or transport can prevent hemostasis.7 Similarly, the tamponade provided by the peritoneum makes abdominal surgery in patients with pelvic fractures particularly challenging, because simply opening the abdomen increases pelvic volume by 15%.30,35 Intrapelvic bleeding can also track into the thorax or abdomen, and retroperitoneal bleeding can dissect anteriorly through the peritoneum.7,8,16


   Fracture Stabilization and Bleeding Management
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Several therapeutic options are available for the management of pelvic fracture and associated bleeding. Care usually begins with some form of pelvic stabilization, with some form of invasive management indicated by continued hemodynamic instability that persists after chest and intraperitoneal injury has been ruled out or by a blood requirement greater than 6 units in 24 hours.12,36

Current trauma management guidelines36,37 recommend that early external pelvic stabilization be considered in hypotensive patients with unstable pelvic fractures and that external fixation precede laparotomy incision if that operation is to be performed. Anterior external fixation provides adequate rotational stability and reduces bleeding by reapproximating bleeding bony surfaces and preventing clot disruption. It may provide an advantageous reduction in pelvic volume.1,7,36 Placement of an external fixator at the time of admission to the hospital can reduce the mortality of patients with unstable pelvic injuries to the level of patients with stable injuries and can decrease the mortality of patients who are initially hypotensive.38 External fixation does not restore vertical stability, which requires posterior stabilization, and it probably does not provide adequate posterior control.1,7,16,17,39–41 Other assessment and care should be provided simultaneously with application of an external fixator.8,16

Anterior external fixation is accomplished with a simple frame that has 2 or 3 pins in each iliac crest.17,41,42 Pins can be placed either above the anterior superior iliac spine or between the anterior iliac spines and can be placed either through an incision or percutaneously. Lower placement may allow better abdominal access, and the strength of both approaches is comparable.4,41,43 The external fixator can be applied in the trauma bay in as few as 15 minutes by skilled operators, but the skill of the trauma team and institutional requirements affect that time.8,16

Another version of the external fixator is the C-clamp, developed to create greater compression of the posterior part of the pelvis at the point of greatest bleeding and to increase the speed of application.1,12 The clamp has 2 pins placed on the posterior part of the ilium, near the sacroiliac joints. The clamp allows continued access to the abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremities.7 In an evaluation1 of the use of clamps in patients with hypotension, the need for blood products was decreased and blood pressure was increased. The clamp can be placed in as few as 10 minutes.8

Pneumatic antishock garments appear to be useful in pelvic fractures, presumably because the garments provide tamponade of injuries to small vessels and immobilize fractures. The garments may be particularly useful in a community hospital setting where patients must be transferred to trauma centers for definitive management. In a follow-up study of 92 patients with pelvic fractures who required more than 6 units of blood, Moreno et al44 found that pneumatic antishock garments alone controlled bleeding in 71% of the patients. In another study, Flint et al45 found that mortality was reduced when the garments were used. Pneumatic antishock garments are easy to use, can be applied rapidly, and are noninvasive. However, they also block access to significant parts of patients, decrease vital capacity and diaphragmatic excursion, and can cause compartment syndromes.7 The garments have been used for up to 48 hours and have been used successfully in children.8,44–46 An inflation pressure of 40 mm Hg is recommended, and the bony prominences of the hips, thighs, knees, and ankles should be padded before the garments are inflated.8

Other alternatives for temporary pelvic stability are available. Often acceptable intermediate support can be achieved by wrapping the pelvic girdle with a bed sheet and then securing the sheet tightly in place. The Trauma Pelvic Orthotic Device, a commercial stabilization corset, has been used with some success, as have the Dallas belt and a collapsible beanbag.36,47

As mentioned earlier, arterial bleeding manageable by embolization is uncommon in patients with pelvic fractures.1,11,12,48 When such an injury does occur, however, embolization is definitive and reduces the mean blood requirement by about 85%.49 The most likely injuries are ones to the superior gluteal artery or internal pudendal arteries.50 Although the indications vary from author to author, angiography is generally suggested when hemodynamic instability persists after nonpelvic sources of bleeding have been excluded, and many authors recommend external fixation before angiography. Injuries to the posterior arch are most often associated with severe bleeding, so earlier angiography may be appropriate for patients with such injuries. Certainly, the timing of angiography should be individualized for each patient and varies according to institutional capabilities and requirements.7,30,31,36,37,51 Adequate personnel and equipment to manage the potential deterioration in status of a critically injured patient should be available during angiography.8

Surgery to control bleeding in pelvic fractures typically is reserved for injuries to large vessels.39 Attempts at surgical control of an expanding pelvic hematoma are rarely successful because of the loss of tamponade from opening the peritoneum and exploring the hematoma.35 Similarly, early internal fixation of pelvic fractures is rarely attempted.15

External bleeding is possible as well. Open pelvic fractures involve marked pelvic visceral injury and are fatal for about half of patients. Profuse rectal or perineal bleeding often occurs, and heavy contamination from gastrointestinal and genitourinary disruption greatly complicates the recovery of patients who survive initial resuscitation.19


   Pelvic Fracture in Multiple Trauma
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Management of patients with multiple trauma is complicated by the presence of pelvic fractures. When the pelvic fracture is discrete, management proceeds as described before. The force required to fracture the pelvis, however, makes associated injury common, and other injuries occur in more than 90% of patients with disruption of the pelvic ring. Head injury is concomitant in 27% of such patients and thoracic injury in 26%.19 Compared with the general population of patients with blunt trauma, patients with anteroposterior pelvic injury have an 800% increase in aortic rupture.52,53

When pelvic fracture is accompanied by head, chest, or extremity injury, management follows trauma guidelines in a fairly straightforward manner, blending specific responses to the associated injuries with the specific management of the pelvic fracture.24 Because a single episode of hypotension or hypoxia dramatically decreases recovery from head injury, the hemodynamic compromise possible with pelvic fracture can be particularly troublesome for patients with head injuries.54

Up to 40% of patients with pelvic fractures also have abdominal injuries, and trauma patients with intra-abdominal blood and pelvic fractures present a diagnostic and management challenge for which no clear consensus on the preferred approach exists.7,16 Distinguishing abdominal from retroperitoneal bleeding in patients with pelvic fractures is difficult but important, because a laparotomy that provides no therapeutic benefit is clearly associated with a high mortality rate and should be avoided.7,16,18,39 Unfortunately, pelvic fractures limit the effectiveness of available diagnostic tools.

Both diagnostic peritoneal lavage and bedside sonography are useful but are complicated by the presence of pelvic fractures. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage has up to 98.9% overall accuracy for detecting peritoneal blood, but the false-positive rate is between 16% and 20% in patients with pelvic fractures.7,8,11 An early diagnostic peritoneal lavage done by using an open, supraumbilical technique helps minimize false-positives, especially those associated with a pelvic hematoma dissecting along the abdominal wall.16,35

Bedside sonography can also be used to detect intra-abdominal bleeding, but information on the use of sonography in patients with pelvic fractures is limited.55 In one study,56 specificity for detecting abdominal bleeding was 100% (positive predictive value 1.0, negative predictive value 0.8), but the false-negative rate was high in patients with fractures of the pelvic ring, patients with the most serious injuries. The authors56 concluded that patients with fractures of the pelvic ring and normal findings on sonography should have appropriately timed CT scans to avoid missed detection of injury. The exact role of sonography in trauma decision making is still being clarified.

CT scanning accurately differentiates the location of bleeding, but the procedure can be time-consuming and in areas poorly staffed and equipped for resuscitation, is associated with a risk for deterioration in patients’ clinical status.7 Little published support exists for CT evaluation of patients with unstable hemodynamic status.36,37

Current trauma management guidelines36,37 recommend that external pelvic fixation precede laparotomy if laparotomy is performed. However, support for early external fixation is not universal, and it may not be used by all trauma teams. Both early laparotomy and early angiographic repair are also advocated. The care plan should be developed collaboratively between staff in trauma surgery, orthopedic surgery, and interventional radiology and varies according to institutional capabilities.30,31,36


   Management in the Critical Care Unit
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Whereas some patients with pelvic fractures arrive in the critical care unit in stable hemodynamic condition, others have profound shock and require aggressive resuscitation to restore perfusion. Management of patients both during and after resuscitation is complex and is fraught with risks for complications.

Resuscitation
A full discussion of massive resuscitation is beyond the scope of this article, but such resuscitation does require consideration of issues, including coagulopathy, hypothermia, and acid-base disorders. Coagulopathy in patients resuscitated with packed red blood cells and crystalloid fluids is due to dilution of clotting factors. Prothombin and activated partial thromboplastin times begin to be prolonged after replacement of roughly half of a patient’s blood volume, and increases in clinically evident bleeding become manifest when the times are more than 1.5 times normal. A similar dilutional effect on platelets occurs and generally becomes critical after depletion of clotting factors. Administration of fresh-frozen plasma will help restore the clotting factors; platelet repletion will be needed for the thrombocytopenia. The use of both products should be guided by specific laboratory results. One recommendation57 is to evaluate prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times and levels of fibrinogen and platelets with every replacement of 5 units of packed red cells.

Coagulopathy is worsened by hypothermia, because of both slowed metabolism and temperature-related platelet dysfunction. Administration of each unit of packed red cells at storage temperatures (1°C–6°C) reduces core body temperature by about 0.25°C. Lowered body temperature also impairs tissue perfusion, increases oxygen consumption, and leads to the development of a metabolic acidosis. Hypothermia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, so all fluids used in resuscitation should be warmed.57

Two other traits of stored blood are also important. Banked blood is acidotic, with a pH between 6.9 and 7.1. Whether administration of banked blood by itself leads to acidosis or the citrate preservative added to stored blood prevents it is unclear. Poorly perfused patients certainly have acidosis, and restoration of tissue perfusion is probably the best approach to resolving the acidosis. Transfusion is also complicated by a time-related degradation of the 2,3-diphosphoglycerate in banked blood. This decrease results in less efficient oxygen delivery from the transfused blood, despite an appropriate hemoglobin response.57

Because hemodynamic stability may not reflect adequate resuscitation, base excess or lactate levels should be evaluated. The base deficit at the time of admission to the hospital correlates well with degree of shock, the need for transfusion, the likelihood of transfusion complications, and risk for death. Nurses should anticipate and prepare for transfusion when the base deficit exceeds 5 mmol/L. Failure to progressively clear lactate is also associated with complications and death. Lactate levels greater than 2.5 mmol/L 12 hours after admission correlate with the development of multiple organ dysfunction, and levels of 8 mmol/L at 24 hours are associated with nonsurvivable injuries. Accordingly, the base deficit or lactate levels should be evaluated at the time of admission and followed up throughout resuscitation. An elevated level of either, even with adequate vital signs, indicates cellular acidosis and should be corrected by increasing oxygen delivery via volume loading, transfusion, or pharmacological measures.57,58

Orthopedic Repair
Permanent orthopedic repair can be accomplished with external or internal fixation and generally is done 24 to 72 hours after injury, when the patient is warm and resuscitated, and does not have acidosis or coagulopathy.

Nondisplaced, stable pelvic fractures do not require surgical intervention and can be managed with analgesics and early mobilization. Displaced anterior fractures, however, require some kind of invasive intervention. External fixation with either a frame or an Ilizarov system avoids the complications and risks of an operation and can sometimes be done without general anesthesia. However, the reduction must be precise.59,60 If a reduction to less than 1 cm of displacement is not maintained throughout healing, about 80% of patients require chronic analgesia, compared with essentially none of those in whom reduction is maintained. External fixators remain in place for 6 to 12 weeks and require meticulous care of the pin site to prevent infection. Twice daily cleaning with hydrogen peroxide swabs is usually adequate.41 The dressing should apply some compression to minimize pin motion. Loose or infected pins need replacement and debridement of the pin site.60

Internal fixation works well, with little occurrence of chronic pain even with strenuous activity. This type of fixation is a complex operation generally performed through a long horizontal incision just above the pubis (the Pfannenstiel incision), and some combination of plates and screws is used.60

Vertically unstable posterior injuries can also be fixed with either external or internal approaches. An external repair is not accomplished with a frame but through placement of percutaneous screws. This approach risks damage to neurological and vascular structures in and near the sacrum, but it is associated with good outcomes when used by surgeons with experience with the procedure. Adequate reduction is sometimes difficult to achieve with a closed approach, necessitating open reduction before placement of the screws. The alternative is to proceed directly to open reduction and internal fixation60 (Figure 6Go).



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Plain radiograph of pelvic fracture repaired with internal fixation by anterior plates and posterior screw. Image courtesy of Adam Starr, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex. Reprinted with permission.

 
After invasive repair, patients generally are given antibiotics for 2 to 3 days and have suction drains in place for 2 days.60 Whatever repair is chosen, early mobilization in important in facilitating recovery and minimizing complications.59,61 Patients with anterior injuries can begin weight bearing when comfortable and can progress as tolerated. Patients with unilateral posterior injuries begin with a limit of 15 kg of weight bearing on the affected side and progress to "as tolerated" at 6 to 8 weeks. Patients with bilateral posterior injuries can do pivot transfers but no other weight bearing until after 6 to 8 weeks.60

Potential Complications
Patients who have multiple trauma may have primary lung injury and are also at risk for the secondary complications of respiratory failure and respiratory distress syndromes. Careful attention to early diagnosis and relief of pneumothorax or hemothorax is important, as are early evaluation of ventilation and oxygenation and ongoing observation for decline in pulmonary function. Risk for primary lung injury is increased in patients with rib fractures, and the risk for complications increases when positive-pressure ventilation is required.61 Use of lung-protective ventilator strategies with smaller tidal volumes, lower pressures, and permissive hypercapnia may help reduce morbidity and mortality.62 Immobility also increases the risk for ventilatory and infections complications, so positioning is important, and early mobilization or early use of a therapeutic bed should be considered.61

Thromboembolic disease is associated with pulmonary disorders and is a known complication of pelvic fracture because of venous stasis, immobility, endothelial damage, and direct venous injury. Deep vein thrombosis occurs in up to 80% of patients with multiple trauma, and clinical pulmonary embolism develops in about 10% of those patients. An equal number may have subclinical emboli. Mortality from pulmonary embolism in patients with pelvic fractures may be as high as 4%.63–65 Because of the high risk, patients with pelvic fractures need prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis, probably with low molecular weight heparin unless contraindicated by uncontrolled bleeding or associated intracranial bleeding. Pneumatic compression devices are useful, unless massive orthopedic injury precludes their use, and the placement of a venacaval filter may be useful if other means of prevention are impossible or unsuccessful. Early mobilization out of bed is also helpful.61,64,66,67 Critical care nurses should maintain a high index of suspicion for pulmonary embolism in patients with a history of pelvic fracture in whom dyspnea, tachypnea, chest pain, wheezing, hypotension, or right ventricular electrocardiographic abnormalities develop.64

Pain management is important independently and also as an adjunct in preventing pulmonary and thromboembolic complications due to reduced mobility. Continuous infusion and patient-controlled administration of analgesics are both generally more effective than nurse-delivered intermittent bolus strategies.61 The Society of Critical Care Medicine standards for analgesia recommend morphine as the drug of choice, with fentanyl available for patients who are allergic to morphine or in whom hemodynamic instability makes the histamine release associated with use of morphine undesirable.68 Use of narcotic analgesics dramatically increases the risk for gastrointestinal complications, so an aggressive gastrointestinal protection strategy should be followed when these drugs are used.61

Patients with pelvic fractures, like all other trauma patients, require prompt and effective nutritional support to optimize their potential for recovery. Enteral feeding is associated with fewer septic complications than is parenteral feeding, and total parenteral nutrition is recommended only if patients cannot meet more than 50% of their nutritional needs by hospital day 7. A specialist should evaluate nutritional needs, and feeding should begin within 24 hours after resuscitation is completed. Patients who have had a laparotomy should probably have small-bowel feedings via either a nasojejunal or a feeding jejunostomy tube. Patients who have not had a laparotomy may do well with gastric feedings, and a trial of gastric feeding is suggested. Serial measurements of prealbumin levels appear to be the most useful way to monitor ongoing nutritional status.69

Wound care is a concern for patients with pelvic fractures. The patients may have other external traumatic injuries and may have surgical sites from internal fixation of the pelvic fractures or repair of other injuries. As described earlier, external fixation requires careful skin care. Open fractures generally require debridement and irrigation in the operating room for at least 4 days and frequent dressing changes.59,61

Colostomy is a common part of the management of visceral injury and is often, but not always, necessary for patients with open pelvic fractures. If the laceration is in the rectal, perineal, buttock, or midline areas, a colostomy is always indicated. As the location of the laceration moves laterally from those areas, the need for colostomy is progressively lower.60,70,71 A colostomy is not without risks. As described earlier, opening the abdomen can disrupt retroperitoneal tamponade. Additionally, operating on the colon can introduce contamination that may not have previously existed and also necessitates subsequent procedures for repair. Careful attention must be paid to the health of the new ostomy site, to the nearby skin, and to preventing contamination of nearby wounds and incisions.70

Immobility increases the risk for iatrogenic skin breakdown, and inadequate nutrition impairs wound healing and the ability to maintain skin integrity. Early feeding, good pain management, adequate resuscitation, and mobility or use of therapeutic beds with repositioning of patients are all key tools in decreasing and preventing integumentary complications.61

Infection can come from surgical sites, open fractures, skin breakdown, pulmonary infection, invasive catheters, and a myriad of other sources. Infection may cause up to 50% of late deaths in patients with pelvic fractures.70 Again, prevention with good nursing care, resuscitation, and feeding is preferred, and antibiotic therapy based on the results of microbial cultures is also important.61

Rehabilitation is also an essential part of the care of patients with pelvic fractures. The physical therapy department should be consulted early in the case and should follow up the patients closely. Critical care nurses have an important role as case managers in helping to ensure that these consultations are ordered and therapies are implemented. Early and expert involvement of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and rehabilitation services is one of the benefits of care at a verified trauma center.


   Conclusion
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Pelvic fractures can range from simple, stable injuries to a component of injury in severe multisystem trauma. Critical care nurses should have a high index of suspicion for pelvic injury, should conduct a careful examination for fractures and associated injuries, and should be prepared for diverse needs of patients and diverse interventions. Recovery from pelvic fracture is a long-term process and can include multisystem complications. Good basic, critical care, and trauma nursing skills and an understanding of the nature of pelvic injuries are important to critical care nursing practice.


   References
 Top
 Epidemiology
 Anatomy
 Assessment for Fracture and...
 Radiological Studies
 Fracture Types and...
 Acute Injury and Management...
 Fracture Stabilization and...
 Pelvic Fracture in Multiple...
 Management in the Critical...
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Buckle R, Browner BD, Morandi M. Emergency reduction for pelvic ring disruption and control of associated hemorrhage using the pelvic stabilizer. Tech Orthop. 1995;9:258–266.
  2. Pohlemann T, Bosch U, Gansslen A, Tscheme H. The Hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop. August 1994:69–80.
  3. Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr, Harrington RM, Tencer AF. Anterior versus posterior provisional fixation in the unstable pelvis: a biomechanical comparison. Clin Orthop. January 1995:245–251.
  4. Tile M. Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:1–12.
  5. Rothenberger DA, Fischer RP, Strate RG, Velasco R, Perry JF Jr. The mortality associated with pelvic fractures. Surgery. 1978;84:356–361.[Medline]
  6. Davidson BS, Simmons GT, Williamson PR, Buerk CA. Pelvic fractures associated with open perineal wounds: a survivable injury. J Trauma. 1993;35:36–39.[Medline]
  7. Wolinsky PR. Assessment and management of pelvic fracture in the hemodynamically unstable patient. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:321–329.[Medline]
  8. Cwinn AA. Pelvis. In: Marx JA, ed. Rosen’s Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice. 5th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2002:625–642.
  9. Gokcen EC, Burgess AR, Siegel JH, Mason-Gonzalez S, Dischinger PC, Ho SM. Pelvic fracture mechanism of injury in vehicular trauma patients. J Trauma. 1994;36:789–795.[Medline]
  10. Tile M, ed. Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins: 1995:41–52.
  11. Gilliland MD, Ward RE, Barton RM, Miller PW, Duke JH. Factors affecting mortality in pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 1982;22:691–693.[Medline]
  12. Agnew SG. Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25:715–21.[Medline]
  13. Patterson FP, Morton KS. The cause of death in fractures of the pelvis: with a note on treatment by ligation of the hypogastric (internal iliac) artery. J Trauma. 1973;13:849–856.[Medline]
  14. Ismail N, Bellemare JF, Mollitt DL, DiScala C, Koeppel B, Tepas JJ III. Death from pelvic fracture: children are different. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:82–85.[Medline]
  15. Failinger MS, McGanity PLJ. Unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;745:781–791.
  16. Coppola PT, Coppola M. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of pelvic fractures. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2000;18:1–27.[Medline]
  17. Kellam JF, McMurtry RY, Paley RR, Tile M. The unstable pelvic fracture: operative treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987; 18:25–41.[Medline]
  18. Green DP, ed. Fractures in Adults. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott; 1984.
  19. Gibbs MA, Bosse MJ. Pelvic ring fractures. In: Ferrera PC, Colucciello SA, Marx JA, Verdile VP, Gibbs MA, eds. Trauma Management: An Emergency Medicine Approach. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1998:330–333.
  20. Taffet R. Management of pelvic fractures with concomitant urologic injuries. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:389–396.[Medline]
  21. Tarman GJ, Kaplan GW, Lerman SL, McAleer IM, Losasso BE. Lower genitourinary injury and pelvic fractures in pediatric patients. Urology. 2002;59:123–126.[Medline]
  22. Hochberg E, Stone NN. Bladder rupture associated with pelvic fracture due to blunt trauma. Urology. 1993;41:531–533.[Medline]
  23. Aihara R, Blansfield JS, Milham FH, LaMorte WW, Hirsch EF. Fracture locations influence the likelihood of rectal and lower urinary tract injuries in patients sustaining pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 2002;52:205–209.[Medline]
  24. American College of Surgeons. Advanced Trauma Life Support Program for Doctors: Student Course Manual. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American College of Surgeons; 1997.
  25. Salvino CK, Esposito TJ, Smith D, et al. Routine pelvic x-ray studies in awake blunt trauma patients: a sensible policy? J Trauma. 1992;33:413–416.[Medline]
  26. Junkins EP, Nelson DS, Carroll KL, Hansen K, Furnival RA. A prospective evaluation of the clinical presentation of pediatric pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 2001;51:64–68.[Medline]
  27. Duane TM, Tan BB, Golay D, Cole FJ Jr, Weireter LJ Jr, Britt LD. Blunt trauma and the role of routine pelvic radiographs: a prospective analysis. J Trauma. 2002;53:463–468.[Medline]
  28. Gonzalez RP, Fried PQ, Bukhalo M. The utility of clinical examination in screening for pelvic fracture in blunt trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:121–125.[Medline]
  29. Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma. 1990;30:848–856.[Medline]
  30. Eastridge BJ, Starr A, Minei JP, O’Keefe GE, Scalea TM. The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma. 2002;53:446–451.[Medline]
  31. Miller PR, Moore PS, Mansell E, Meredith JW, Chang MC. External fixation or arteriogram in bleeding pelvic fracture: initial therapy guided by markers of arterial hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2003;54:437–443.[Medline]
  32. Buckle R, Browner BD, Morandi M. Emergency reduction for pelvic ring disruption and control of associated hemorrhage using the pelvic stabilizer. Tech Orthop. 1995;9:258–266.
  33. Tile M. Pelvic fractures: operative versus nonoperative treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 1980;11:423–464.[Medline]
  34. Klein SR, Saroyan M, Baumgartner F, Bongard FS. Management strategy of vascular injuries associated with pelvic fractures. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1992;33:349–357.[Medline]
  35. Henry SM, Tornetta P III, Scalea TM. Damage control for devastating pelvic and extremity injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:879–895.[Medline]
  36. Shackford SR, recorder. Pelvic injury symposium. Presented at: OTA-AAST Combined Annual Meeting, October 12, 2000; San Antonio, Tex. Available at: http://www.hwbf.org/ota/s2k. Accessed January 16, 2003.
  37. DiGiacomo JC, Bonadies JA, Cole FJ, et al. Practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture. Winston-Salem, NC: Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma; 2001. Available at: http://www.east.org/tpg/pelvis.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2002.
  38. Riemer BL, Butterfield SL, Diamond DL, et al. Acute mortality associated with injuries to the pelvic ring: the role of early patient mobilization and external fixation. J Trauma. 1993;35:671–677.[Medline]
  39. Jerrard DA. Pelvic fractures. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1993;11:147–163.[Medline]
  40. Tucker MC, Nork SE, Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr. Simple anterior pelvic external fixation. J Trauma. 2000;29:989–994.
  41. Yang AP, Iannacone WM. External fixation for pelvic ring disruptions. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:331–344.[Medline]
  42. Sanders R, DiPasquale T. Eternal fixation of the pelvis. Tech Orthop. 1990;4:60–64.
  43. Noordeen MH, Taylor BA, Briggs TW, Lavy CB. Pin placement in external fixation. Injury. 1993;24:581–584.[Medline]
  44. Moreno C, Moore EE, Rosenberger A, Cleveland HC. Hemorrhage associated with major pelvic trauma: a multispecialty challenge. J Trauma. 1986;26:987–994.[Medline]
  45. Flint LM Jr, Brown A, Richardson JD, Polk HC. Definitive control of bleeding from severe pelvic fractures. Ann Surg. 1979;189:709–716.[Medline]
  46. Flint L, Babikian G, Anders M, Rodriguez J, Steinberg S. Definitive control of mortality from severe pelvic fracture. Ann Surg. 1990;211:703–706.[Medline]
  47. FitzPatrick MK. A new tool for initial stabilization of pelvic fractures. J Trauma Nurs. 2002;9:20–21.
  48. Ghanayem AJ, Wilber JH, Lieberman JM, Motta AO. The effect of laparotomy and external fixator stabilization on pelvic volume in an unstable pelvic injury. J Trauma. 1995;38:396–400.[Medline]
  49. Matalon TS, Athanasoulis CA, Margolies MN, et al. Hemorrhage with pelvic fractures: efficacy of transcatheter embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;133:859–864.[Abstract]
  50. Kam J, Jackson H, Ben-Menachem Y. Vascular injuries in blunt pelvic trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 1981;19:171–186.[Medline]
  51. Ben-Menachem Y. Exploratory angiography and transcatheter embolization for control of arterial hemorrhage in patients with pelvic ring disruption. Tech Orthop. 1995;9:271–274.
  52. Ochsner MG Jr, Champion HR, Chambers RJ, Harviel JD. Pelvic fracture as an indicator of increased risk of thoracic aortic rupture. J Trauma. 1989;29:1376–1379.[Medline]
  53. Oschner MG Jr, Hoffman AP, DiPasquale D, et al. Associated aortic rupture-pelvic fracture: an alert for orthopedic and general surgeons. J Trauma. 1992;33:429–434.[Medline]
  54. Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. J Neurotrauma. 1996;13:641–734.[Medline]
  55. Rozycki GS. Abdominal ultrasonography in trauma. Surg Clin North Am. 1995;75:175–191.[Medline]
  56. Ballard RB, Rozycki GS, Newman PG, et al. An algorithm to reduce the incidence of false-negative FAST examinations in patients at high risk for occult injury. Focused Assessment for the Sonographic Examination of the Trauma Patient. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:145–151.[Medline]
  57. Drummond JC, Petrovitch CT. The massively bleeding patient. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001;19:633–649.[Medline]
  58. Mikhail J. Resuscitation endpoints in trauma. AACN Clin Issues. 1999;10:10–21.[Medline]
  59. Cryer HG, Johnson E. Pelvic fractures. In: Feliciano D, Moore E, Mattox K. Trauma. Stamford, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1996:635–659.
  60. Guyton JL, Crockarell JR Jr. Fractures of acetabulum and pelvis. In: Canale ST, ed. Campbell’s Operative Orthopedics. 10th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2003:2939–2984.
  61. Hudak CM, Gallo BM, Morton PG, eds. Critical Care Nursing: A Holistic Approach. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott; 1998.
  62. Wilmoth D. New strategies for mechanical ventilation: lung protective ventilation. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1999;11:447–454.[Medline]
  63. Buerger PM, Peoples JB, Lemmon GW, McCarthy MC. Risk of pulmonary emboli in patients with pelvic fractures. Am Surg. 1993;59:505–508.[Medline]
  64. DeWet CJ, Pearl RG. Postoperative thrombotic complications: venous thromboembolism—deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 1999;17:895–922.
  65. Kelsey LJ, Fry DM, VanderKolk WE. Thrombosis risk in the trauma patient: prevention and treatment. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14:417–430.[Medline]
  66. Montgomery KD, Geerts WH, Potter HG, Helfet DL. Thromboembolic complications in patients with pelvic trauma. Clin Orthop. August 1996:68–85.
  67. Rogers FB, Cipolle MD, Velmahos G, Rozycki G. Practice management guidelines for the management of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. Winston-Salem, NC: Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma; 2001. Available at: http://www.east.org/tpg/dvt.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2003.
  68. Shapiro BA, Warren J, Egol AB, et al. Practice parameters for intravenous analgesia and sedation for adult patients in the intensive care unit: an executive summary. Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1596–1600. Also available at: http://www.sccm.org/pdf/analgesia.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2002.[Medline]
  69. Jacobs DO, Jacobs DG, Kudsk KA, et al. Practice management guidelines for nutritional support of the trauma patient. Winston-Salem, NC: Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma; 2003. Available at: http://www.east.org/tpg/nutrition.pdf. Accessed January 16, 2003.
  70. Woods RK, O’Keefe G, Rhee P, Routt ML Jr, Maier RV. Open pelvic fracture and fecal diversion. Arch Surg. 1998;133:281–286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Pell M, Flynn WJ Jr, Seibel RW. Is colostomy always necessary in the treatment of open pelvic fractures? J Trauma. 1998;45:371–373.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Take the CE Test
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frakes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frakes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS