CCN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Critical Care Nurse. 2006;26: 19-20
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chevoya, L.
Right arrow Articles by Housholder-Hughes, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chevoya, L.
Right arrow Articles by Housholder-Hughes, S.


Letters to the Editor

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications

In the article, "Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Management Strategies for Optimal Outcomes" (February 2006[suppl]: S8-S34), Susan Housholder-Hughes presents a very good, broad overview of many facets of this syndrome and its management. However, there is some information on anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications that I feel may be misleading and benefit from further clarification.

On page 23, it is stated that direct thrombin inhibitors do not require monitoring; however, they do. Argatroban, lepirudin, and hirudin all must be closely monitored by partial thromboplastin time (PTT) as often as every 2 hours to ensure appropriate dosing. With argatroban, PTT should be checked 2 hours after initiation of the infusion, and 2 hours after any change, then can be decreased to twice daily if at goal range. For lepirudin and hirudin, PTT should be checked 4 hours after initiation or change, then can be decreased to daily if at goal range. Also, because argatroban is cleared hepatically, the starting infusion rate should be lower than the 2.0 µg/kg/min noted if there is any hepatic impairment.

Lepirudin and hirudin are cleared renally and dose adjustments are also necessary. Bivalirudin (more commonly used during percutaneous interventions) should have associated activated clotting time monitoring, if there is any renal impairment.

The issue of thrombocytopenia resulting from use of some glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors is reviewed; however, it is not noted that a baseline platelet count of under 100000 is a contraindication to using any of these agents. It is also stated (page 24) that eptifibitide "has not been associated with increased rates of thrombocytopenia vs placebo," with reference given to the PURSUIT trial experience in 1999.1 While realizing that the article was written in 2004, a review of more recent references since 1999 would have been helpful to show how more recent clinical experiences have added to the side effect profile of the drug. Although thrombocytopenia appears to be less common with eptifibatide, there have been several reports of severe thrombocytopenia associated with eptifibatide,25 and myself and my colleagues have experienced this clinically many times as well.

References

  1. McClure MW, Berkowitz SD, Sparapani R, et al. for the PURSUIT Investigators. Clinical significance of thrombocytopenia during a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. The Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial experience. Circulation. 1999;99:2892–2900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Paradiso-Hardy FL, Madan M, Radhakrishnan S, Hurden S, Cohen EA. Severe thrombocytopenia possibly related to readministration of eptifibatide. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. September 2001;54:63–67.[Medline]
  3. Hongo RH, Brent BN. Association of eptifibatide and acute profound thrombocytopenia. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:428–431.[Medline]
  4. Yoder M, Edwards RF. Reversible thrombocytopenia associated with eptifibatide. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:628–630.[Abstract]
  5. Coons JC, Barcelona RA, Freedy T, Hagerty MF. Eptifibatide-associated acute, profound thrombocytopenia. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:368–372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lynne Chevoya, RN, CS, MSN, CCRN
Boston, Mass


 

The author responds

The comments about the need for monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors and the contraindication to use of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors in patients with a platelet count of less than 100000/mL are valid and accurate, and I thank Ms Chevoya for this clarification.

As for the lack of increase in thrombocytopenia with eptifibatide versus placebo, the prescribing information for INTEGRILIN (eptifibatide) states that the rates of thrombocytopenia in the PURSUIT trial with eptifibatide and placebo were similar. As reported by McClure and colleagues,1the rates of thrombocytopenia (defined as platelet count<100000/mL or <50% of baseline) in the PURSUIT trial were 7% (319/4603) in the placebo group and 6.9% (314/4614) in the eptifibatide group, demonstrating that eptifibatide is not associated with increased incidence of thrombocytopenia versus placebo. Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, such as PURSUIT, provide the most reliable scientific evidence regarding the prevalence of relatively infrequent events, such as thrombocytopenia, while also allowing the comparison of individual event rates with the active drug versus placebo. Although individual cases of severe thrombocytopenia in patients receiving eptifibatide have been reported in the literature, as noted by Ms Chevoya, it is unclear whether thrombocytopenia is directly related to the use of this drug in these cases. Additionally, these case reports do not have a control group, in contrast to randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Finally, treatment with eptifibatide, including readministration within 28 days, has not been associated with development of antibodies to eptifibatide (as described in the INTEGRILIN prescribing information), a finding that is consistent with the absence of increased thrombocytopenia with eptifibatide versus placebo in the PURSUIT trial. Therefore, in my opinion, the statement "eptifibatide has not been associated with increased rates of thrombocytopenia vs placebo" is still accurate and valid.

Reference

  1. McClure MW, Berkowitz SD, Sparapani R, et al. for the PURSUIT Investigators. Clinical significance of thrombocytopenia during a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. The Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial experience. Circulation. 1999;99:2892–2900.
Susan Housholder-Hughes, RN, MSN, CCRN, APRN, BC
Ann Arbor, Mich





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chevoya, L.
Right arrow Articles by Housholder-Hughes, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chevoya, L.
Right arrow Articles by Housholder-Hughes, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS