CCN Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Critical Care Nurse. 2008;28: 37-41
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solseng, T.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwald, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solseng, T.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwald, B.


Clinical Article

In Vitro Formation of Biofilms on Lopez Enteral Feeding Valves: Implications for Critical Care Patients and Nurses

Tracy Solseng, BS
Heather Vinson, BS
Penelope Gibbs, PhD
Beverly Greenwald, RN, PhD, CNS, CGRN


Tracy Solseng is a graduate student working on a master’s degree in food safety at North Dakota State University in Fargo. She is studying the plasmids associated with Enterobacter sakazakii.

Heather Vinson is a microbiologist working in Penelope Gibbs’ laboratory at the Great Plains Institute of Food Safety at North Dakota State University in Fargo.

Penelope Gibbs is an assistant professor of infectious diseases at the Great Plains Institute of Food Safety at North Dakota State University in Fargo. She teaches courses in pathogenic microbiology, bacterial genetics and phage, and microbiological molecular techniques to both undergraduate and graduate students. She also trains undergraduate students on research techniques and hypothesis testing.

Beverly Greenwald is an assistant professor of nursing at North Dakota State University in Fargo. She teaches undergraduate courses in nursing research and nursing management and does clinical rotations with students in adult health. Her research focus is gastroenterology nursing.

To purchase reprints, contact The InnoVision Group, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. Phone, (800) 899-1712 or (949) 362-2050 (ext 532); fax, (949) 362-2049; e-mail, reprints{at}aacn.org.

Financial Disclosures
This research project was funded by ICU Medical, San Clemente, California, manufacturers of the Lopez enteral feeding valve.

Corresponding author: Beverly Greenwald, RN, PhD, MSN, CNS, CGRN, Assistant Professor of Nursing, Department of Nursing, North Dakota State University, 136 Sudro Hall, PO Box 5055, Fargo, ND 58105-5055 (e-mail: Beverly.Greenwald{at}ndsu.edu).


The Lopez enteral feeding valve (ICU Medical, San Clemente, California) is a 3-way stopcock valve made of polycarbonate and polypropylene (Figure 1Go). This device is used to create a closed, feeding tube system when inserted between a percutaneous enteral gastrostomy or nasogastric feeding tube (which enters the gastrum) and the enteral feeding tubing (which is connected to a container of enteral nutrition). Use of the 3-way stopcock creates a closed system and eliminates the need to disconnect the tubing to check gastric residual volumes and to administer water flushes and medications. The opportunity for reflux of gastric contents during tubing changes is also eliminated with a closed system. Use of a Lopez valve provides several potential benefits to nurses, patients, and facilities (see TableGo).


Figure 1
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 The Lopez enteral valve (ICU Medical, San Clemente, California) is a 3-way stopcock used to attach a 60-mL Foley-tip syringe to the closed feeding tube system (the patient’s percutaneous enteral gastric or nasogastric tube and the enteral feeding tube).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table Potential benefits of the Lopez enteral feeding valve to nurses, patients, and facilities

 
The Lopez valve is classified by the Food and Drug Administration as a class III medical device3; therefore, it can be used nonsterile for enteral feedings (although a sterile product is available). The Food and Drug Administration does not require manufacturers to provide recommendations for frequency of changing. A Lopez valve can be used indefinitely (personal communication, Peter Hoffman, ICU Medical product specialist), although the tubing, container of nutritional formula, and flush syringes are usually replaced every 24 hours, per facility policy.


   Biofilm
 Top
 Biofilm
 Purpose
 Methods
 Results
 Implications for Critical Care...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Many medical devices can become the focus of a patient’s infection, which can be difficult to treat because the causative bacteria exist in biofilms. A biofilm is a community of microbial cells that are irreversibly attached to a substratum and interfaced with each other. Production of a biofilm is a 2-stage process: first, the bacteria attach to the surface of a device, and then cell-to-cell adhesion and pluristratification occur. A 3-dimensional, extracellular polymer matrix, produced by the bacteria, embeds the bacteria in place. Formation of biofilms is partially controlled by quorum sensing, an interbacterial communication mechanism of densely populated cells. Antibiotic resistance is facilitated by biofilms because efficient transfer of virulence and resistance genes takes place in these densely populated groups of cells.4 Another hypothesis for this resistance is an extracellular signal, or alarmone, released from killed bacteria that may prime surrounding recipients into a state of resistance by the premature death of the peripheral cells. Overall, antimicrobial resistance is multifactorial and varies from microbe to microbe.

Prevention and control of biofilms on medical devices require consideration of the unique and tenacious nature of biofilms. Multiple intervention strategies include preventing initial colonization of the device, minimizing attachment of bacterial cells to the device, penetrating the biofilm matrix to kill the bacterial cells, and removing the device from the patient.6 Eventually, removal of the medical device may be necessary because a biofilm can cause acute or chronic infectious disease. The ability of biofilms to resist disinfectants and antibiotics makes them a public health problem.7 Biofilms are an important cause of nosocomial infections, because once established, the bacteria harbored inside are less exposed to a patient’s immune response and are less susceptible to antibiotics.8

Biofilms can form on many medical devices used in the critical care unit. Included among these devices are urethral catheters,9 central vascular catheters,10 endotracheal tubes, ventilator circuits,11 ventricular assist devices,12 dialysis catheters,13 artificial hearts,14 orthopedic implants,15 stainless steel,16,17 and enteral feeding tubes.16

Dautle et al18 studied silicon gastrostomy devices previously used for feeding (9–47 months) and found that all of them had biofilms. The biofilms were cultured, and the bacteria were identified. Dautle et al18 identified 24 species of bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in the used gastrostomy devices.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram-negative, aerobic rod and a known producer of biofilms.19 Pseudomonas can cause ventilator-associated pneumonias and is one of the most common agents isolated in several studies.2022 Because Pseudomonas organisms are ubiquitous, members of the genus are opportunistic human pathogens and typically infect the urinary tract,23 lungs,24 wounds,25 blood,26 and burns.27 Any reservoir of Pseudomonas biofilm in a patient could be the source of a nosocomial infection.

Many critical care patients receive enteral nutrition via percutaneous enteral gastrostomy or nasogastric tubes. These patients are often vulnerable and fragile. Biofilms are an important cause of nosocomial infections, to which critical care patients are particularly susceptible. Biofilms can form on numerous medical devices used in critical care units, including percutaneous enteral gastrostomy tubes. The Lopez valve is a device that facilitates enteral nutrition via percutaneous enteral gastrostomy and nasogastric tubes.


   Purpose
 Top
 Biofilm
 Purpose
 Methods
 Results
 Implications for Critical Care...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The purpose of this research study was to determine if a bacterial biofilm would form on Lopez enteral feeding valves when the valves were cultured with P aeruginosa in Lennox L broth (LB, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri) at 25°C for 14 days. This study was done to develop a protocol for future studies that will include several objectives: to determine the time necessary for biofilm to form when feeding formula is used as a culture medium, to identify microorganisms present in the biofilm on Lopez valves that patients have used, and to determine if the bacteria can be cultured from the biofilm (which would support the idea that the bacteria could be a source of nosocomial infection).


   Methods
 Top
 Biofilm
 Purpose
 Methods
 Results
 Implications for Critical Care...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Pseudomonas aeruginosa was chosen for this study for several reasons. This organism is a known biofilm producer, it has been associated with silicon gastrostomy devices, and a variety of clinically significant infections have been associated with it. Lennox L broth is routinely used for other work on biofilms. The Lopez device is used at room temperature, so an incubation temperature of 25°C was chosen for this study. The initial culture time was randomly chosen to be 14 days, to ensure the establishment of a biofilm.

Lopez valves were submersed in liquid nitrogen and fractured by applying blunt force to expose the inner surfaces for scanning electron microscopy. Cultures of P aeruginosa of approximately 109 colony-forming units per milliliter were added to the Lopez fragments in 24-well, sterile culture plates (Becton Dickinson and Co, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey). The plates were incubated at 25°C for 14 days. The cultured fragments were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Millonig’s buffer at pH 7.35 for 2 days at room temperature. The specimens were washed in the same buffer and treated with 2% osmium tetroxide in Millonig’s buffer. After another wash with buffer, the specimens were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and critical-point dried in an AutoSamdri 810 (Tousimis, Rockville, Maryland) with liquid carbon dioxide used as the transitional fluid. The dried specimens were attached to aluminum specimen mounts by using silver paint. Specimens were then coated with gold in a Balzers SCD 030 sputter coater (BAL-TEC RMC, Tucson, Arizona) and photographed with a JEOL JSM-6300 scanning electron microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, Massachusetts) with an accelerating voltage of 15 keV.


   Results
 Top
 Biofilm
 Purpose
 Methods
 Results
 Implications for Critical Care...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Biofilms of P aeruginosa had formed on the Lopez valve fragments after 14 days of incubation at 25°C. Figure 2Go is the scanning electron microscope field photographed at 12 000X magnification.


Figure 2
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm (12 000X magnification) on a fractured Lopez enteral feeding valve after 14 days of culture in Lennox L broth at 25°C. Bacterial growth, although not quantified, was present on every observed field of every Lopez fragment.

 

   Implications for Critical Care Nursing Research and Practice
 Top
 Biofilm
 Purpose
 Methods
 Results
 Implications for Critical Care...
 Conclusion
 References
 
We established that P aeruginosa can create a biofilm on Lopez valves during a 14-day culture in Lennox L broth at 25°C. Although our results are of interest, more research must be done and verified before specific practice recommendations can be made. Future experimentation may determine if a biofilm develops when a common enteral feeding formula, rather than Lennox L broth, is used. If a biofilm does develop on Lopez valves under these conditions, it is important to determine if bacteria can be isolated and cultured from the biofilm. Lopez valves that patients have used could be cultured to identify the bacterial species present and/or the presence of biofilms by using the technique described.


   Conclusion
 Top
 Biofilm
 Purpose
 Methods
 Results
 Implications for Critical Care...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Biofilms have been associated with acute or chronic infectious diseases and are resistant to disinfectants and antibiotics. Critical care nurses might consider changing Lopez valves at intervals of 14 days or less and perhaps at each tubing change (or per facility policy).

Additionally, critical care nurses may contemplate other opportunities to promote infection control, because biofilms can develop on numerous medical devices. Overall, few evidence-based guidelines are available for nursing practice regarding these devices. Staff education about the production of biofilms may help promote adherence to facility policies on changes of medical devices.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Scott Payne, MS, Thomas Freeman, PhD, and Jayma Moore, DVM, for their assistance with the scanning electron microscopy.


   References
 Top
 Biofilm
 Purpose
 Methods
 Results
 Implications for Critical Care...
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Lopez enteral valve product information. ICU Medical, Inc Web site. http://www.icumed.com/lopez-valve.asp. Accessed November 17, 2007.
  2. Lopez valves. eGeneralMedical+com Web site. http://app.infopia.com/Shop/Control/fp/user/Shop/Control/Product/fp/SFV/27578/vpid/2922788/vpcsid/0/rid/123441. Accessed November 17, 2007.
  3. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov. Accessed November 9, 2007.
  4. Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs. 2005; 28(11):1062–1068.[Medline]
  5. Gilbert P, Maira-Litran T, McBain AJ, Rickard AH, Whyte FW. The physiology and collective recalcitrance of microbial biofilm communities. Adv Microb Physiol. 2002;46:202–256.[Medline]
  6. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15(2):167–193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cappelli G, Ricardi M, Ravera F, et al. Biofilm on artificial surfaces. Contrib Nephrol. 2007; 154:61–71.[Medline]
  8. Cernohorská L, Votava M. Biofilms and their significance in medical microbiology [in Czech]. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2002;51(4):161–164.[Medline]
  9. Koseoglu H, Aslan G, Esen N, Sen BH, Coban H. Ultrastructural stages of biofilm development of Escherichia coli on urethral catheters and effects of antibiotics on biofilm formation. Urology. 2006;68(5):942–946.[Medline]
  10. Khare MD, Bukhari SS, Swann A, Spiers P, McLaren I, Myers J. Reduction of catheter-related colonization by the use of a silver zeolite-impregnated central vascular catheter in adult critical care. J Infect. 2007;54(2): 146–150.[Medline]
  11. Berra L, De Marchi L, Yu ZX, Laquerriere P, Baccarelli A, Kolobow T. Endotracheal tubes coated with antiseptics decrease bacterial colonization of the ventilator circuits, lungs, and endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100(6):1446–1456.[Medline]
  12. Babu R, Gill R, Farrar D. Biostability of Thoralon left ventricular assist device blood pumping sacs after long-term clinical use. ASAIO J. 2004;50(5):479–484.[Medline]
  13. Hanlon GW, Denyer SP, Hodges NA, Brant JA, Lansley AB, Al-Rustamani WA. Biofilm formation and changes in bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity during growth in a CAPD model system. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2004;56(7):847–854.[Medline]
  14. Dob sák P, Vask°u J, Jan cík J, Eicher JC, Wotke J. Pathogenesis of various forms of infection in artificial hearts. Pathophysiology. 2003;9(3):161–178.[Medline]
  15. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Baldassarri L, et al. Detection of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis from implant infections: comparison of a PCR-method that recognizes the presence of ica genes with two classic phenotypic methods. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;76(2):425–430.[Medline]
  16. Kim H, Ryu JH, Beuchat LR. Attachment of and biofilm formation by Enterobacter sakazakii on stainless steel and enteral feeding tubes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(9):5846–5856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Olsson E, Friberg O, Venizelos N, Koskela A, Kallman J, Soderquist B. Coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery: attachment to and accumulation on sternal fixation stainless steel wires. APMIS. 2007;115(2):142–151.[Medline]
  18. Dautle MP, Wilkinson TR, Gauderer MW. Isolation and identification of biofilm microorganisms from silicone gastrostomy devices. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(2):216–220.[Medline]
  19. Dautle MP, Ulrich RL, Hughes TA. Typing and subtyping of 83 clinical isolates purified from surgically implanted silicone feeding tubes by random amplified polymorphic DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40(2):414–421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Guimaraes MM, Rocco JR. Prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a university hospital and prognosis for the patients affected. J Bras Pneumol. 2006;32(4):339–346.[Medline]
  21. Kollef MH, Morrow LE, Niederman MS, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns among patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 2006;129(5):1210–1218.[Medline]
  22. Rello J, Allegri C, Rodriguez A, et al. Risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in presence of recent antibiotic exposure. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(4):709–714.[Medline]
  23. Arya SC, Agarwal N, Agarwal S. Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary pathogens in a tertiary care hospital. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(6):270–271.[Medline]
  24. Combes A, Luyt CE, Fagon JY, Wolff M, Trouillet JL, Chastre J. Early predictors for infection recurrence and death in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(1):146–154.[Medline]
  25. Lipsky BA. Empirical therapy for diabetic foot infections: are there clinical clues to guide antibiotic selection? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(4):351–353.[Medline]
  26. Nakamura T, Shimizu C, Kasahara M, Nakata C, Munakata M, Takahashi H. Differences in antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, isolated from blood cultures, set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy. J Infect Chemother. 2007;13(1):24–29.[Medline]
  27. Hosseini SV, Tanideh N, Kohanteb J, Ghodrati Z, Mehrabani D, Yarmohammadi H. Comparison between Alpha and silver sulfadiazine ointments in treatment of Pseudomonas infections in 3rd degree burns. Int J Surg. 2006;5(1):23–26.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solseng, T.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwald, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solseng, T.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwald, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS