Critical Care Nurse. 2008;28: 83-85
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
Practice Alerts
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Practice Alert Statements
All patients receiving mechanical ventilation, as well as those at high risk for aspiration (eg, decreased level of consciousness, enteral tube in place), should have the head of the bed (HOB) elevated at an angle of 30° to 45° unless medically contraindicated.1–7 (Level VI)
Use an endotracheal tube (ET) with a dorsal lumen above the endotracheal cuff to allow drainage by continuous suctioning of tracheal secretions that accumulate in the subglottic area.1,2,8–13 (Level VI)
Do not routinely change, on the basis of duration of use, the patients ventilator circuit.1,14–17 (Level VI)
Supporting Evidence
- Critically ill patients who are intubated for >24 hours are at 6 to 21 times the risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)1,2,18–20 and those intubated for <24 hours are at 3 times the risk of VAP.20 Other risk factors for VAP include decreased level of consciousness, supine positioning with HOB flat, use of H2 antagonists and antacids, gastric distention, presence of gastric or small intestine tubes, enteral feedings, and a trauma or COPD diagnosis.1,18–22 VAP is reported to occur at rates of 10 to 35 cases/1000 ventilator days, depending on the clinical situation.1,19
- Morbidity and mortality associated with the development of VAP is high, with mortality rates ranging from 20 to 41%.20,23–25 Development of VAP increases ventilator days, critical care and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) by 4, 4 and 9 days, respectively,18,23,26 and results in >$11 000 additional costs/VAP case.18,25,27
- Micro or macro aspiration of oropharyngeal and/or gastric fluids are presumed to be an essential step in the development of VAP.1,2,12,28 Pulmonary aspiration is increased by supine positioning and pooling of secretions above the ET tube cuff.1,3,19
- Compared to supine positioning, studies have shown that simple positioning with HOB elevation to 30° or higher significantly reduces gastric reflux and VAP,3–7 yet national surveys and reports in the literature describe poor compliance rates with HOB elevation in critical care units.20,29–34
- Studies on the use of special ET tubes that remove secretions pooled above the cuff with continuous suction decrease VAP by 45% to 50 %.8–11
- Studies on the frequency of ventilator circuit changes have found no increase in VAP with prolonged use.14–17
- National regulatory and expert consensus groups include the AACN VAP Practice Alert interventions as critical to decreasing VAP rates.1,2,35–37
Actions for Nursing Practice
- Always keep mechanically ventilated patients HOB elevated to 30° or higher, unless medically contraindicated; use an ET tube with continuous suction above the cuff in patients expected to be intubated >48 hours; do not routinely change ventilator circuits.
- Ensure that your critical care unit has written practice documents such as a policy, procedure or standards of care that includes these practice alerts.38
- Determine your units rate of compliance with the HOB elevation directive and use an ET tube with continuous suction above the cuff (click here for PI audit tool).
- If compliance with HOB elevation is <90%, develop a plan to improve compliance29,38–45
Consider forming a multidisciplinary task force (nurses, physicians, respiratory therapists, clinical pharmacists) to address VAP practice changes.
Educate staff about the significance of hospital-acquired pneumonias in critically ill patients and how the interventions listed in the Practice Alert can reduce VAP (click for education slide program).
Incorporate content into orientation programs, initial and annual competency verifications.
Develop a variety of communication strategies to alert and remind staff of the importance of these VAP interventions and to disseminate results of audits.
Develop documentation standards for HOB elevation that include a rationale for when HOB elevation is not done.
Incorporate HOB elevation to at least 30° in mechanically ventilated patients or patients at high risk for aspiration in any unit standing orders. Also include HOB elevation monitoring in your critical care scorecard/QI plan/PI activities to assure that compliance levels are maintained.
Expected Outcomes
- Decrease in VAP rates for the unit
- Increase in number of patients with HOB elevation to at least 30°
- Cost savings due to decreased rates of VAP and less frequent ventilator circuit changes
Resources
Education Materials
Power Point slide program for VAP education sessions (www.aacn.org)
Online continuing education program on prevention strategies for VAP (http://www.nellcor.com/educ/onlineed.aspx)
Audit Tools
Measurement of compliance with HOB elevation in mechanically ventilated patients (www.aacn.org)
Others
Methods for estimating HOB elevation (www.aacn.org)
For additional information/assistance, contact a clinical practice specialist with the AACN Practice Resource Network (PRN) via e-mail at practice{at}aacn.org or via phone at (800) 394-5995, ext 217.
References
- Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R, Bridges C, Hajjeh R; CDC; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for preventing health-care associated pneumonia, 2003: Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Review (MMWR). 2004;53(RR-3):1–36. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5303a1.htm. Accessed February 12, 2007.
- American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:388–416.[Free Full Text]
- Torres A, Serra-Batiles J, Ros E, et al. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the effect of body position. Ann Internal Med. 1992;116:540–542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ibanez J, Penafiel A, Raurich J, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition: effect of supine and semi recumbent positions. J Parent Ent Nutr. 1992;16:419–422.
- Orozco-Levi M, Torres A, Ferrer M, et al. Semi-recumbent position protects from pulmonary aspiration but not completely from gastroe-sophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1387–1390.[Abstract]
- Drakulovic M, Torres A, Bauer T, et al. Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;354:1851–1854.[Medline]
- Davis K Jr, Johannigman J, Campbell R, et al. The acute effects of body position strategies and respiratory therapy in paralyzed patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2001;5:81–87.[Medline]
- Valles J, Artigas A, Rello J, et al. Continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 1995;122:179–186.
- Mahul P, Auboyer C, Jospe R, et al. Prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in Intubated patients: respective role of mechanical subglottic secretion drainage and stress ulcer prophylaxis. Intensive Care Med. 1992;18:20–25.[Medline]
- Kollef M, Skubas N, Sundt T. A randomized clinical trial of continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions in cardiac surgery patients. Chest. 1999;116:1339–1346.[Medline]
- Dezfulian C, Shojania K, Collard HR, Kim HM, Matthay MA, Saint S. Subglottic secretion drainage for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2005;118:11–8.[Medline]
- Cook D, KeJonge B, Brochard L, Brun-Buisson C. Influence of airway management on ventilator-associated pneumonia: evidence from randomized trials. JAMA. 1998;279:761–787.
- Smulders K, van der Hoeven H, Weers-Pothoff I, Vandernbroucke-Grauls C. A randomized clinical trial of intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2002;121:858–862.[Medline]
- Dreyfuss D, Djedaini K, Weber P, et al. Prospective study of nosocomial pneumonia and of patient circuit colonization during mechanical ventilation with circuit changes every 48 hours versus no change. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1991;143:738–743.
- Kotilainen H, Keroack M. Cost analysis and clinical impact of weekly ventilator circuit changes in patients in intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 1997;25:117–120.[Medline]
- Kollef M, Shapiro S, Fraser V, et al. Mechanical ventilation with or without 7-day circuit changes: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Internal Med. 1995;123:168–174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Long M, Wickstrom G, Grivmes A, Benton C, Belcher B, Staff A. Prospective, randomized study of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with one versus three ventilator circuit changes per week. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;17:14–19.[Medline]
- Rello J, Ollendorf D, Oster G, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest. 2002;122:2115–2121.[Medline]
- Craven D. Epidemiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 2000;117:186S–187S.[Medline]
- Kollef M. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multivariate analysis. JAMA. 1993;270:1965–1970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Flanders SA, Collard HR, Saint S. Nosocomial pneumonia: state of the science. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34:84–93.[Medline]
- Elatrous S, Boujdaria R, Merghili S. Incidence and risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a one-year prospective study. Clin Intensive Care. 1996;20:193–198.
- Bercault N, Boulain T. Mortality rate attributable to ventilator-associated nosocomial pneumonia in an adult intensive care unit: a prospective case-control study. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:2303–2309.[Medline]
- Heyland D, Cook D, Griffith L, et al. The attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critically ill patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:1249–1256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilatorzassociated pneumonia: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2184–93.[Medline]
- Chastre J, Fagon J. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:867–903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Warren K, Shukla S, Olsen M, et al. Outcomes and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1312–1317.[Medline]
- Bonten M, Kollef M, Hall J. Risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia: from epidemiology to patient management. Healthcare Epidemiol. 2004;38:1141–1149.
- Zack J, Garrison T, Trouillion E, et al. Effect of an educational program aimed at reducing the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2407–2412.[Medline]
- Berenholtz S, Pronovost P. Barriers to translating evidence into practice. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9:321–325.[Medline]
- Grap M, Cantly M, Munro C, et al. Use of backrest elevation in critical care: pilot study. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8:475–480.[Abstract]
- van Nieuwenhoven CA, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, van Tiel FH, et al. Feasibility and effects of the semirecumbent position to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomized study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:396–402.[Medline]
- Grap M, Munro C, Bryant S, Ashtiani B. Predictors of backrest elevation in critical care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2003;19:68–74.[Medline]
- Grap MJ, Munro CL. Preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: evidence-based care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2004;16:349–358.[Medline]
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). Specification Manual for National Hospital Quality Measures – ICU. http://www.jointcommission.org/PerformanceMeasurement/MeasureReserveLibrary/Spec+Manual+-+ICU.htm. Accessed February 12, 2007.
- Burns S, ed. AACN Protocols for Practice: Care of Mechanically Ventilated Patients. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2007.
- Shojania K, McDonald K, Wachter R, Owens D. Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies. Volume 6 - prevention of healthcare-associated infections. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2007. AHRQ publication No. 04(07)-0051–6. www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/ptsafety/chap17a.htm. Accessed February 12, 2007.
- Helman D, Sherner J, Fitzpatrick T, Callender M, Shorr A. Effect of standardized orders and provider education on head-of-bed positioning in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2285–2290.[Medline]
- Craven DE. Preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: sowing seeds of change. Chest. 2006;130(1):251–60.[Medline]
- Babcock H, Zack J, Carrison T et al. An educational intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in an integrated health system: a comparison of effects. Chest. 2004;125:2224–2231.[Medline]
- Grap MJ, Munro CL. Quality improvement in backrest elevation: improving outcomes in critical care. AACN Clin Issues. 2005;16(2):133–139.[Medline]
- Fox MY. Toward a zero VAP rate: personal and team approaches in the ICU. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2006;29(2):108–14.[Medline]
- Murray T, Goodyear-Bruch C. Ventilator associated pneumonia improvement program. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007;18(2):190–199.[Medline]
- Kollef M. Prevention of hospital-associated pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1396–1405.[Medline]
- Isakow W, Kollef MH. Preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: an evidence-based approach of modifiable risk factors. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;27:5–17.[Medline]